.

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

American Involvement in Vietnam War

The sweet Morning Glories among the Peas was indite by James D. Seddon, a mechanic and expert surveillance personnel office of the US soldiery. He was one of the US soldiers who was involved in the Vietnam War. In this novel, he wrote round of his experiences albeit fighting and surviving in Vietnam. Nevertheless, he similarly offered almost political issues that he thinks should be addressed by the US government. The Vietnam War was both a soldiers and ideological war. When Vietnam was divided into dickens parts sexual union and South Vietnam, tensions were rising mingled with the two nations.North Vietnam had a Communist government supported by both the Soviet confederacy and Red China. It was headed by Ho Chi Minh who defeated the French during the Vietnamese war of independence. South Vietnam was democratic in government. A duly constitute government was elected by the South Vietnamese under the price of its constitution. South Vietnam was supported by the join Sta tes. When the North Vietnamese army invaded South Vietnam, c wholly for its defense was alerted by the fall in States. Allied nations of the United States responded and began sending troops to South Vietnam.The United Nations Security Council called for the deployment of troops in South Vietnam to relieve the pressure from the South Vietnamese army confine in the invasion. The United States, under the presidency of Lyndon Baines Johnson sent troops to Vietnam without the operateal declaration of War. Hence, the Vietnam War came to its early phase of battle. The book was about a Vietnam War veteran who saw the horrible events in the war the crashing(a) massacre of villages by US troops suspected of hiding North Vietnamese, the frequent ambush of US marines in the jungles of Vietnam, and many other events narrated in the book.Since the book is non-fiction, it guarantees a wide range of historical discourse on policies on war and political ideological struggles. Nevertheless, the wide array of stately dialogues and conjunctures betweens characters provide the audience the atmosphere of intense conflict, of which, the most pervasive is the reality of war as politics and of politics as war. The Vietnam War was the prolonged war involving the United States (1961-1975), yet it was only the war in which the United States was defeated.The intense realities of the war which the author was trying to convey in his novel was a blanch or result of ideological struggle between the US and the Communist bloc. It was often argued that the United States fought a war of non-sense, and policy-makers at that time were not concerned of practicality, but only of necessity. Vietnam was strategicalal since it holds the distinguish to the numerous bodies of water surrounding the newly-born democratic republics of atomic number 34 Asia. If Southeast Asia fell to the Communists, what are then the chances for the United States to maintain its ideological restraint?The implic ation of the authors argument may hold the key to the very purpose of sending expeditions to South Vietnam. Soldiers were sent to a tear where they have no affinities. They were serving a war that does not guinea pig their interests. Added to that, the war seemed to be a reflection of their nations position to maintain world leadership at all costs, by all means. Hence then, the experiences of the veteran in the novel were a reflection of the intolerance of the insistence of the United States to maintain its ideological dominance in the form of a genuine defense of democracy. It was in many ways irresponsible, unconcerned, and strategic from the point of view of those who fought in the battle fronts. As for the author, his experiences of senseless massacres of villages, drunkenness of wells, senseless cleansings of soldiers, indiscriminate bombings of cities and towns, were the direct results of this desire the desire for ideological and military dominance. It was even implied in the title of the novel. Do morning glories really be among peas?Does this serves as an allegory of the conflicting conditions in Vietnam and the United States? Or does this foretell a struggle for ideological dominance? Or simply a way of reiterating the realities of war brought by the things mentioned above? It seems that the novel covered these issues presented, although some of them may be highlighted and some cast aside. The realities presented by the author (who was a veteran of the war) were, in my interpretation, the embodiment of the war policies of the United States.These were policies that prioritize political orientation rather than human self-respect. The novel also presented the decay of human dignity brought about by the Vietnam War. Human dignity is loosely found in the ability of humans to live comfortably without the interference of foreign powers, that is, turn development under the term of a just legal standard. The encroachment of the United States into the lives of the South Vietnamese brought them anguish and despair.The United States also suffered because it mixed-up almost 500, 000 men in the war. Nevertheless, it lost the pride and status achieved decades ago. It was generally an unwarranted war. The novel is generally a good source of historical information about the war in Vietnam. It also gives a original and clear description of Vietnam its muckle, goals, and achievements. Nevertheless, it should be noted that there are some form of biases in the novel sometimes favoring the United States sometimes attack its war policies.For instance, to describe the North Vietnamese as senseless killing machines is generally unacceptable especially for educated men who view these people as freedom-loving. Nevertheless, it can also be argued that the book also suffered from the credulities of a simplistic master piece. Although it accurately describes reality, the author was unable to highlight his literary style in the novel (novice) . Reference Seddon, James D. 1990. Morning Glories among the Peas A Vietnams Veteran Story. Iowa State. e-bay bookstore download. http//worldcat. org//22181821?

No comments:

Post a Comment